"Homophobia especially - it's just off the mark. It's ascribing a mental disability to someone, and suggests a knowledge that we don't have. It seems inaccurate. Instead, we would use something more neutral: anti-gay, or some such, if we had reason to believe that was the case."

"We want to be precise and accurate and neutral in our phrasing," he said.

George Weinberg, a psychologist credited with introducing the term in 1972, disagrees:

It encapsulates a whole point of view and of feeling. It was a hard-won word, as you can imagine. It even brought me some death threats. Is homophobia always based on fear? I thought so and still think so.... We have no other word for what we're talking about, and this one is well established. We use 'freelance' for writers who don't throw lances anymore and who want to get paid for their work.

Rod Dreher, meanwhile, applauds the change:

I know people who for whatever reason morally disapprove of homosexuality, but who are friends with gay people, and who aren't the least bit afraid of them. [ . . . ]

To label these things as phobias is to psychologize what may be a rational moral stance, given the premises. Is an Orthodox Jew or Muslim "porkophobic" because their religion forbids consuming pork?

The changes have already been made to the AP's online stylebook and are slated to appear in the printed edition next year.

END