Will we allow the government to dictate whom we must hire to be in our institutions? It may be a do or die decision--"do" go along with the government(s), or "die" by declining to obey government dictates and lose our tax exempt status and all federal and (sometimes) state funds--including guaranteed subsidized student loans?

Across the country, now, some people within conservative Christian organizations and institutions are courageously daring to sue their organizations and institutions to force them to open the doors fully to practicing LGBTQ people. Sooner or later, some federal court will side with them and remove Christian schools' and other Christian organizations' tax exempt status if they do not stop excluding practicing LGBTQ people from their ranks.

By "practicing" I mean LGBTQ people who are or want to be married to people of the same sex and/or who are dating and possibly having sex with people of the same sex. A democratically sponsored "equality bill" in the U.S. Congress would, if passed, make such people a protected category--invincible (legally) to discrimination. I am not talking about people who are merely attracted to people of the same sex. Most Christian organizations and institutions do not discriminate against them.

If that bill passes, and if courts uphold it, and if the federal government threatens to cancel tax exemption and federal student loans to students in religious schools (for example) that exclude practicing gays, what will Christian schools do? Will they give in and exchange their long-standing, strongly-held ethical beliefs for money? Or will they follow the example of the ancient Christians before Constantine and the radical reformers of the sixteenth century (and beyond) and find a way to exist without tax exempt status and government supported student loans (and other government funds for research, etc.)?

I am aware of two Christian colleges who have seen this crisis and decision coming. Both have rejected government funds such as federally guaranteed and subsidized student loans that come with strings attached that violate their collective Christian consciences. Somehow they have managed to survive. I do not know if they still enjoy tax exempt status.

Years ago the IRS withdrew tax exempt status from a major conservative Christian university because of its racist policies and practices--which were not technically illegal. Because the university was widely considered fundamentalist and racist, hardly any other Christians came to its defense. While I abhor racism, I think they--the other Christians--made a mistake. We should have seen the direction, the hand writing on the wall, so to speak. If government can withdraw tax exempt status from a religious organization for good reasons, it can withdraw tax exempt status from religious organizations for bad reasons. Given the post-Christian condition of our society, this seems inevitable.

My advice is for all Christian organizations and institutions to begin planning for a future without tax exempt status and without government support--direct or indirect. We need to look back to our ancient, pre-Constantinian Christian ancestors and our radical reforming Christian ancestors of the sixteenth century (and beyond) and plan for a near future when we will have to live and worship and teach like they did--without any granted privileges or support, direct or indirect, from the dominant culture and from government.

END